Nov 19, 2007, 11:44 PM // 23:44
|
#21
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
It would destroy low-hp farming builds like the 55 HP monk
|
Which is exactly why it shouldn't be implemented, and exactly why Protective Spirit has remained isolated from Izzy's wrath.
|
|
|
Nov 19, 2007, 11:46 PM // 23:46
|
#22
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2007
Profession: N/
|
you cannot ask people to defend there opinions on this idea because it is utter crap and it goes with out saying this is a bad idea
end note dont fix that which is not boken
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 01:47 AM // 01:47
|
#23
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
A better idea is to put a limit on the -HP instead. Say have no more than -15 health from all rune sources after the first one. Another thing to do would be to make -HP offhands non-stacking with the -hp from runes.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 01:52 AM // 01:52
|
#24
|
The Greatest
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterclaw
A better idea is to put a limit on the -HP instead. Say have no more than -15 health from all rune sources after the first one. Another thing to do would be to make -HP offhands non-stacking with the -hp from runes.
|
Farming is pretty much dead. Having these 55 monks running around causes no harm. Whats the point of nerfing them?
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:00 AM // 02:00
|
#25
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Astral Revenants
Profession: P/W
|
I suppose it'd kill 55s. But won't it break game balance at the same time?
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:00 AM // 02:00
|
#26
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: Twenty Gold For Mountain Troll [Tusk]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
Yes, you bothered to post, now you have to make a point.
|
Ok then. It would destroy the purpose of having different types of runes, might as well give everyone the same stats from the beginning. Pointless to change major game mechanics in a game well over 2 years old.
Maybe discuss this in the GW2 suggestion thread where it obviously belongs.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:06 AM // 02:06
|
#27
|
Alcoholic From Yale
Join Date: Jul 2007
Guild: Strong Foreign Policy [sFp]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
Terribad suggestion regarding runes
|
Lol, wut? This suggestion is so bad. Lets make things easier, amirite?. Goddamn carebear
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
Unban Soticoto. He does not deserve a permaban
|
I think this explains how much merit we ought to give your suggestion.
/notsigned
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:09 AM // 02:09
|
#28
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
Farming is pretty much dead. Having these 55 monks running around causes no harm. Whats the point of nerfing them?
|
Rebalancing PvE is like rebalacing PvP, it shakes things up.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:09 AM // 02:09
|
#29
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Guildless, pm me
Profession: R/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
I assure you that superior runes are used in PvP.
|
only in very very rare cases, i can only think of 2 off the top of my head
Paraway (Sup spear)
BSpike (sup blood)
if they nerfed the 55 monk, they could remove loot scaling and such, and the price of ebay gold would go up, making it less desirable to the community, as long as it doesnt affect pvp, i'd /sign it, but if it did, i'd have to /notsign it
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:14 AM // 02:14
|
#30
|
The Greatest
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterclaw
Rebalancing PvE is like rebalacing PvP, it shakes things up.
|
What exactly is this going to "shake up" in PvE? Low hp builds get nerfed, people get mad, people QQ on the fansites, people bash ANet, people ragequit GW. Farming goes from shit to shittier, and then everyone moves on. Yes, this is really shaking up the PvE scene.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 02:32 AM // 02:32
|
#31
|
La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
* It would destroy low-hp farming builds like the 55 HP monk
|
As if anyone would care. I really don't see why people constantly feel the need to have changes implemented to mess with the farmers anyway.
Anyway, I love this idea. I'm all for any change that would make pumping weapon mastery up to 16 (or a magic line to 16) without losing any of my amazing 650+ health so that gimmicky spikes are easier to pull off, because that's all the Guru mods know how to play (and all we ever do is PvP, naturally).
__________________
Stay Breezy
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 03:15 AM // 03:15
|
#32
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
What exactly is this going to "shake up" in PvE?
|
You never know unless anet tries it out for a week or two.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 03:22 AM // 03:22
|
#33
|
Teenager with attitude
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
I'm impressed. I thought Sardelac ideas couldn't get any worse.
__________________
People are stupid.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 03:42 AM // 03:42
|
#34
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
They can always get worse.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 04:00 AM // 04:00
|
#35
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Apr 2005
Guild: Death Infernal Evil
Profession: Mo/R
|
if you REALLY wanted to nerf 55 monks, just take away the collector items with -50 health problem solved and no messing around with sup runes needed
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 04:00 AM // 04:00
|
#36
|
The Greatest
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterclaw
You never know unless anet tries it out for a week or two.
|
But we do know. ANet does this, people will bitch and complain until it's changed back. That's a fact
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 04:08 AM // 04:08
|
#37
|
Teenager with attitude
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jwh6913
if you REALLY wanted to nerf 55 monks, just take away the collector items with -50 health problem solved and no messing around with sup runes needed
|
105 farming existed before 55 farming.
__________________
People are stupid.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 04:43 AM // 04:43
|
#38
|
Wark!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
But we do know. ANet does this, people will bitch and complain until it's changed back. That's a fact
|
People will bitch about everything, even if it's good for the game overall.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 05:27 AM // 05:27
|
#39
|
Desert Nomad
|
I kinda agree with this idea. No more than 1 superior rune of profession (except for superior vigor) is a great idea and kill the 55 anything builds. I've always thought the 55 monk wasn't really an rpg type of character and more of a gamey build. It's one of those Flavor or the GW lifetime builds that just needs to be put to bed now and man would that kill all those monk bots we see in various places. I'd laugh.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2007, 07:16 AM // 07:16
|
#40
|
Forge Runner
|
Right how, the difference between 14 and 16 in an attribute is considered "not worthwhile to sacrifice 75 HP for". The usual PvP experts here told me. Two superior runes makes one suspicious of suicidal tendencies. So much about variety. It sounds similar to the "variety" of inscriptions on weapons, where 15^50 or +5 energy are being used over the ton of others.
What balance would be destroyed if everyone would have ONE superior rune? PvP, PvE? It would add to the power creep, but that was it.
Including/excluding Superior Vigor would also make things quite different.
Critical hits would go up with higher weapon mastery, but healing would also improve and would allow a 15/11/11 attribute spread on monks.
That 55 HP farming would be gone would be a side effect. People could still use other farming builds, "600 HP" being the most obvious alternative. Or farming with another class.
Seems I have hit a nerve with this suggestion, people quitting because they can no longer 55 HP farm or the final nail to the coffin of GW PvP sounds quite dramatic. Of course there is no immediate need to change this now, hence the GW2 tag. It is just food for thought, not food for rants like that:
Quote:
Lol, wut? This suggestion is so bad. Lets make things easier, amirite?. Goddamn carebear
|
And this makes me a "goddamn carebear"? Especially as I suggested nerfing a certain "bear" in GW. Still do not get it that mods permit such rabid schoolyard rants.
Last edited by Longasc; Nov 20, 2007 at 07:19 AM // 07:19..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM // 22:49.
|